Check your business visibility in AI
Free, with no credit card required.
Your company has a strong offering, publishes content regularly and attracts traffic from Google. Yet when someone asks how to solve a problem, ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity provides your competitors' sources. What should you improve so your brand appears more often in these answers?
Start by identifying the information the user needs and where it can be reliably verified. An article, product documentation, study or external review should provide a specific reason to cite that material. Including a keyword and your company name is not enough.
Below is a practical plan for working on citations. These are actions to test in your industry, rather than a description of a disclosed ranking algorithm or a guarantee of growth.
What does a brand citation in an AI answer mean?
In marketing, "brand citation" often describes several different situations. Separate them before setting the goal of a GEO campaign, meaning activities that support visibility in AI-generated answers.
- Brand mention - the company name appears in an answer, without necessarily including a link
- Citation of your own website - the answer links to a specific page on your domain as a source
- Citation of external material about your brand - AI cites a review, article or other material published outside your domain
- Brand recommendation - the answer presents your offering as a solution that fits the user's needs
A company can be recommended without a link to its website. Its report can also be cited even though the answer does not recommend its product. A cited ranking may mention several competitors and say nothing about your brand.
Assess both the link and the statement it accompanies. Check whether the material actually supports that information and concerns your company. This is a better basis for evaluation than the number of references alone.
How do citations differ in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity?
Compare specific environments and operating modes. An answer generated without search, a result using web search and an analysis of an uploaded file rely on different sources of information.
| System | What you should know | What to check in an audit |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Search | OAI-SearchBot handles access to content for search features, while GPTBot has a separate training-related purpose | Access for the search crawler and the specific sources displayed in the answer |
| Gemini Apps | Sources and related links do not appear in every answer and may lead to content related to part of it | The type of link, the page content and the information it is meant to support |
| Perplexity | Pro Search searches different materials and provides direct links to sources | The selected mode, the cited URL and the consistency between the material and the answer |
This table is based on the documentation for OpenAI crawlers, sources in Gemini Apps and Perplexity Pro Search.
Do not automatically transfer findings between products. Gemini Apps, AI features in Google Search and an application using the Gemini API are different environments. Likewise, an answer obtained through an API does not necessarily reproduce what a consumer application user sees.
1. Check whether AI can access your content
Accessibility is the first thing to check when a valuable page does not appear among sources. Ask the person responsible for your website to check server responses, crawler rules and any security blocks.
OpenAI recommends making your site accessible to OAI-SearchBot and allowing traffic from its published IP ranges. This crawler's settings are independent of GPTBot. You can allow search while opting out of using your content to train models. The details are in the official OpenAI documentation.
Perplexity identifies PerplexityBot as the crawler used to surface websites in search results. It recommends checking robots.txt and access from official IP ranges. When configuring a firewall, verify both the crawler identifier and IP address, following the Perplexity documentation.
In a practical audit, also check:
- Access to important pages without signing in or manually completing an anti-bot challenge
- Whether key information is available as text rather than only in images
- The correctness of canonical URLs, redirects and internal links
- The absence of accidental indexing blocks on pages intended to be visible in search engines
- Server logs showing whether authorized crawlers actually retrieve the material
Fixing a block makes the source accessible. The AI system still decides whether to select the material for a particular answer.
2. Choose questions where a citation has business value
Your topic list should come from customer questions. Start with sales conversations, support requests, on-site searches and questions that arise before a purchase.
For a software company, these might concern integrations, implementation, costs and differences between solutions. For a local service provider, the service scope, location, qualifications and terms of cooperation may be more important.
Build a set that covers several intents:
- Recognizing a problem - "How can I check whether AI recommends my company?"
- Looking for a solution - "Which tools analyze cited sources in AI answers?"
- Comparing offerings - "How can I compare platforms for monitoring AI visibility?"
- Checking a specific brand - "How does Semly analyze the sources of AI answers?"
Questions containing the brand name show how AI interprets information about the company. Questions without it help you check whether the brand appears when users discover solutions. Report these two groups separately to avoid inflating your assessment with tests that already suggest the answer.
3. Publish material that gives a reason to cite it
First ask: "What information can a reader reliably verify only in this material?" The answer helps distinguish a useful resource from another general article.
Your own data with a documented methodology
An industry report should explain what was studied, over which period and with which sample. Add metric definitions, the data collection method and the limitations of the analysis. If the study concerns AI answers, specify the systems, modes and question selection rules.
A number without context is hard to assess. "The brand appeared in 18 out of 60 answers in the question set studied" tells you more than "brand visibility is 30%" without an explanation of scope. This is an example of presenting data, not a Semly study result.
Documentation and answers to product questions
Describe features, integrations, limitations and terms of use in places that can be linked to directly. For a question about a specific integration, its current documentation is more valuable than a general company description on the homepage.
Comparisons and case studies
Base comparisons on transparent criteria and dated information. Explain who a solution suits and when another option may be preferable. In a case study, state the starting point, the actions taken, the analysis period and how the result was calculated.
An example describing a real implementation process offers readers more than an anonymous story ending with "we achieved great results". Only publish data you have permission to use.
4. Make information easy to understand and verify
Start a section with a short answer, then expand on the conditions, example and source. This structure helps readers find information quickly and assess its basis.
Instead of writing "we offer a comprehensive next-generation solution", describe what the user can do, what result they receive and what affects feature availability. Use precise product, category and market names.
Prepare consistent company information: its name, official domain, offering scope and the material's author. Update facts when features or terms change. Show the actual publication date and the date of substantive updates.
Schema.org JSON-LD data can organize descriptions of a page, organization, author and article. It should match the visible content. Google explains that AI Overviews and AI Mode do not require a special Schema.org type or an additional AI file. These are guidelines for Google Search features, not a statement of Gemini Apps rules. See Google Search Central.
Implement structured data alongside good writing, clear structure and current information. Correct JSON-LD alone does not promise a citation in any of the three systems.
5. Develop external sources that describe your brand specifically
Your website can confirm product specifications. External material can describe a customer's experience, an expert assessment or the use of a solution in a particular situation. Both perspectives are useful, but play different roles.
Analyze the sources that appear for important questions. Do the systems refer to industry media, documentation, review sites, reports or specialist discussions? Check the specific page and its content before deciding on a PR action.
We suggest focusing on publications that contribute information:
- An expert comment explaining a customer's problem
- A reliable product test describing the method and limitations
- An implementation case study published by a customer or partner
- An industry article using your original data
- An up-to-date company profile on a site relevant to the category
Ensure the name, website address and offering description are correct. Do not treat ten copies of the same information as ten independent confirmations. Recognize duplicates when analyzing sources too.
We describe this process in more detail in "How external brand mentions influence AI recommendations". We discuss Perplexity's selection of material in "What sources does Perplexity use when recommending companies and tools?".
How can you measure citation growth without distorting results?
Set a fixed list of questions and compare answers under similar conditions. Record the date, product, mode, language, market and whether search was used. If you change the question set or how answers are generated, note it in the report.
In manual tests, start new conversations and save answers before making further requests for sources. "Cite my company" tests the response to a direct suggestion. It does not replace a question a customer would ask independently.
| Metric | Suggested definition for your own audit | What it helps assess |
|---|---|---|
| Share of answers citing your domain | Answers with at least one citation of your domain / all successfully obtained answers in the set | How regularly your content is cited |
| Question coverage by citations | Questions with at least one such citation during the period / all questions studied | The range of topics where the website is a source |
| Cited pages | Number of different URLs on your domain identified as sources | Which resources to develop and update |
| External sources about your brand | Different cited materials from other domains whose content actually concerns the brand | The brand's presence outside its website |
| Recommendations and mentions | Answers recommending the brand and answers containing its name, counted separately | The relationship between citations and offering visibility |
These are working definitions for an audit, not names of built-in metrics in the Semly dashboard. For example, 12 answers citing your domain out of 60 successfully obtained answers gives 20%. Five links to that domain in a single answer still count as one answer meeting the condition.
Record the number of answers with visible sources separately. Do not turn failures and empty results into answers without citations - report them as missing data. Before counting different pages, remove tracking parameters from URLs and identify redirects leading to the same material.
In Gemini, retain the category "source or related link" if the interface does not let you determine the link's role. The absence of a visible source means no observable citation, rather than proof that the model does not know the company.
How does Semly help you choose the next actions?
AI monitoring in Semly lets you analyze brand presence, competitors and cited sources. It includes viewing answers with citations and analyzing domains appearing as sources. The range of available systems depends on the active plan.
Use this information to choose a specific task. If a competitor's documentation appears for an integration question, check whether you have an equally precise page. If the source is an offering comparison, assess the criteria it describes and whether the information about your brand is current.
Work in a repeatable cycle: choose an important question, read the answer, open the source, identify missing information and plan an improvement. After implementing it, return to the same question set. When you need a comparison with another product or mode, supplement the analysis with a separate test under documented conditions.
Semly describes regular question checks, brand and source detection and change analysis in its AI monitoring guide. The results help set priorities rather than automatically proving that a single publication caused a change.
A 30-day plan: from an audit to the first improvements
Treat the first month as time for measurement, resource preparation and initial comparisons. Results may require longer observation.
Week 1: measure the starting point
Choose your customers' most important questions and group them by intent. Record answers and sources separately for each system. Check page accessibility and identify where competitors provide information missing from your website.
Week 2: improve the key materials
Update a few pages that answer specific questions. Add conditions, examples, an author and sources. Connect the material to the relevant product or service page. If you publish data, complete the methodology and analysis scope.
Week 3: prepare value for external sources
Develop an expert comment, material with your own data or an implementation description that may interest readers of a selected publication. Update existing company profiles and outdated offering information. Choose publishing opportunities based on their subject matter and material quality.
Week 4: compare and decide on the next step
Repeat the measurement under the same conditions. Check changes in cited URLs, question coverage and recommendations. Record implementation dates. If results change, also verify new competitor sources and changes in mode or model. Choose the next improvement based on observations.
FAQ: brand citations in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity
Can you guarantee a brand citation in AI answers?
You cannot guarantee a citation in a particular answer. You can improve material accessibility, usefulness and verifiability, then measure results for a fixed question set. Assess effects separately for each system and mode.
Is a brand mention the same as a website citation?
No. A mention means the brand name appears, while a website citation identifies material as a source. A recommendation is another separate outcome: the brand is presented as a solution for the user.
Do you need to allow GPTBot to appear in ChatGPT Search?
GPTBot and OAI-SearchBot settings are independent. OAI-SearchBot concerns search, while GPTBot concerns using content to train models. An access audit for ChatGPT Search should include the search crawler and official IP ranges.
Does Schema.org increase AI citations?
Correct structured data describes the page, author and organization, but does not guarantee citation growth. Treat JSON-LD as part of organizing your website alongside accessibility, current information and content answering specific questions.
How long do GEO actions take to produce effects?
There is no universal timeframe. The first month can be dedicated to an audit and improvements, but assessing effects requires further measurements. Record change dates and test conditions instead of attributing a single answer to one publication.
Where should you start analyzing brand citations in Semly?
Start with questions that matter to customers, answers containing your brand and domains identified as sources. Compare them with competitors and open the specific materials. Use this to choose a page to improve or a topic to develop.
Share:
